|
||||||||
T H E F R E N C H C E N T R E F O R R E S E A R C H
A N D S T U D I E S O N T H E W O R L D E C O N O M Y The CEPII - Past CEPII Newsletters - PDF Format - Subscribe / Unsubscribe C O N T E N T S: FOCUS The Economic Impact of Immigration for Aging Countries Western Europe has long been a point of departure towards the new world, but it has now become a region of net immigration, notably due to its level of development and wealth. Nonetheless, although immigration was considered as a resource until the first oil shock, questions about the benefits of this phenomenon surfaced at the end of the post-war economic boom, marked by the appearance of mass unemployment.
Regarding the labor market, the local adjustments by workers and firms lead to an almost imperceptible impact on the scale of the country receiving the immigration flow, even though redistributive effects are clearly manifest. Thus, the consequences are microeconomic. Some natives find themselves in competition with an external work force and thus lose employment opportunities, while others benefit from reduced labor costs as a consequence of the arrival of new potential workers and firm creation produced by a local rise in the consumer population. Once aggregated, these effects compensate for each other almost exactly, leaving no visible effect of immigration on the macroeconomic landscape. The consequences of immigration likewise deserve to be considered at the level of national budgets equilibrium. The existence of generous welfare systems in Western Europe, intended to mitigate certain imbalances in the labor market (e.g., unemployment, exclusion, insufficient income for access to housing or health care) or to direct family policy, may exert an attractive force on populations living in the poorest regions. The impact of immigration on public finances is a controversial issue that has given rise to a vast literature, particularly in the United States. One of the conclusions of these studies is that the impact of immigration on welfare systems is limited. For example, in France, immigrants tend to be younger than natives and the difference in the age distribution of both populations leads to a higher net average contribution to the public budget. In this context, immigration appears as an important variable both through its direct effects on public finances and as an instrument of policy seeking to reduce the aging process. In the French case, the old age dependency ratio (population aged 65 and over related to the population aged 16-64) is projected to increase from around 25% in 2000 to nearly 45% in 2050. With a welfare system essentially based on upward redistribution (from young to old), this aging population will mechanically result in financing needs of social security that could reach 3 points of GDP by 2050 (and remain constant until 2100). Immigration, as projected in official forecasts, reduces the tax burden of an aging population. Without migration, the financing needs of social protection at the end of the century would increase from 3% to about 5% of GDP. These benefits are mainly explained by the age structure of net flows, younger than the French population as a whole, and mostly affect unsurprisingly the two pillars of social protection the most sensitive to demographic changes: pensions and health. For similar reasons, a more ambitious migration policy (corresponding to a doubling of net inflows) would contribute to reducing the tax burden of an aging population. But the financial gains are relatively moderate in comparison to the demographic changes they imply: a burden reduction between 20% and 30% depending on the selectivity degree is combined with an increase in the working age population between 16% and 20% and an immigrant share that will double by the end of the century. A more selective policy (in favor of skilled workers) can amplify these gains in the short-medium term but in relatively low proportions. However, this improvement is only temporary. In the long term, demographic changes of a more selective immigration policy (skilled migrants have lower fertility rates and a longer life expectancy) outweigh its positive effects compared to a non-selective policy. References: Aleksynska, M. & Tritah, A., (2010), Immigration et productivité dans les pays de l'OCDE, Revue économique, Vol. 61, N° 3. Aleksynska, M., (2010), Assimilation of Immigrants in Europe: a Multidimensional Process, La Lettre du CEPII, N° 305, December. Aleksynska, M., (2010), Civic Participation of Immigrants in Europe: Assimilation, Origin, and Destination Country Effects, European Journal of Political Economy, December. Borgy, V. & Chojnicki, X., (2009), Labor Migration: Macroeconomic and Demographic Outlook for Europe and Neighborhood Regions, International Economics, No° 119. Borgy, V., Chojnicki, X., Le Garrec, G. & Schwellnus, C., (2010), Macroeconomic Consequences of Global Migration in an Ageing World: a General Equilibrium Analysis, Annales d'économie et statistiques, N° 97-98. Chojnicki, X., (2011), Impact budgétaire de l’immigration en France, Revue économique, N° 62(3). Chojnicki, X. & Ragot, L., (2011), L’immigration peut-elle sauver notre système de protection sociale ?, La Lettre du CEPII, N° 311, juin. Chojnicki, X. & Ragot, L., (2011), Immigration, vieillissement démographique et financement de la protection sociale : une évaluation par l’équilibre général calculable appliqué à la France, CEPII Working Paper, N° 2011-13, mai. Chojnicki, X., Docquier, F. & Ragot, L., (2011), Should the US have Locked Heaven’s Door? Reassessing the Benefits of Postwar Immigration, Journal of Population Economics, N° 24(1). Khoudour-Casteras, D. & Esteves, R., (2009), Remittances, Capital Flows and Financial Development During the Mass Migration Period, 1870-1913, CEPII Working Paper, N° 2009-12, June. Tritah, A., (2008), The Brain Drain Between Knowledge Based Economies: the European Human Capital Outflows to the US, International Economics, Vol. 115. More Bankers, More Growth? Evidence from OECD Countries
Does finance spur economic growth? At the end of the 1990s, this debate seemed definitively closed: an abundant empirical literature supported a causal and positive effect of finance on GDP. However, the recent crisis has altered the mindset on this issue. In particular, there have been intense debates on the size of the financial industry, regarded by some as excessive. One of the problems in the literature on the finance-growth nexus is that financial development is typically measured by the size of the financial market which might be misleading: an increase of credit volume for instance does not mean that the financial sector completes its functions better. Sometimes, this is even just the opposite: an excessive growth of credit may undermine the financial system and hurt economic growth. The subprime mortgage crisis is a good example of such an unproductive financial deepening.
We argue that financial deepening should not only be assessed with familiar measures of financial activities outputs (e.g. credit volume), but also through its inputs (e.g. number of employees) or the efficiency of the financial intermediation process (measured by the ratio number of employees/credit volume). Overall, our study supports the absence of a positive relationship between financial deepening and economic growth for OECD countries over the last forty years. Gunther Capelle-Blancard & Claire Labonne
Who Carries the Burden of Bank Taxation?
In the wake of the crisis, a number of proposals were put forward to impose a levy on financial institutions. Some proponents argue that the sole purpose of such a tax is to recover the costs of direct fiscal support. Others argue that the bank levy could be designed as a “Pigouvian” tax both helping to raise revenues and serving as a macro-prudential tool to motivate banks to undertake less risky activities. In light of these proposals, we propose to study the impact of bank taxation on the cost of financial intermediation and, hence, cost of capital for firms. Despite the importance of this issue, there is little available evidence. The notable exception is the paper by Demirguc-Kunt and Huizinga (2001) that analyzes bank level data for 80 countries from 1988 to 1995.
We propose to investigate whether the burden of taxation is passed through by banks to their customers, relying on a sample of 27 EU countries from 1996 to 2009. The data for estimations is drawn from the BankScope database that provides balance sheets and income statements of individual banks. Our initial results confirm previous findings that bank taxation partly falls on bank customers by increasing the wedge between interest rates on loans and deposits. However, taxation is responsible for only 6% of this wedge, much less than the structure of liabilities, market power and cost-efficiency. We next proceed to investigate a potential heterogeneity between banks in the pass-through depending on the market structure (Herfindahl index, market share and bank size) and competition (Panzar and Rosse h-statistic, Lerner index). Gunther Capelle-Blancard, Olena Havrylchyk & Claire Labonne
Reference: Demirguc Kunt, A. & Huizinga, H. (2001), The Taxation of Domestic and Foreign Banking, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 79, pages 429-453. Immigration, Unemployment and Growth in the Host Country: Panel Granger Causality Analysis for OECD Countries
During the last decades, most OECD countries experienced an increase in international migration.
Economists have studied the impact of immigration on a variety of host country outcomes and also how economic conditions in the receiving countries affect migration flows. This paper contributes to the existing literature on immigration by investigating the causality relationship between immigration and host country economic conditions (unemployment and growth) using the panel Granger causality testing approach, that is based on SUR systems and Wald tests with country specific bootstrap critical values. This approach allows testing for Granger causality on each individual panel member separately by taking into account the possible contemporaneous correlation across countries. Using annual data over the period 1980-2005 for 22 OECD countries which are the major migrants-recipients countries, our study provides evidence that the interaction between immigration and host economic activity depends on the host country. Our findings suggest that, only in Portugal does unemployment negatively Granger cause immigration inflow. In four countries (France, Iceland, Norway and United Kingdom) economic growth positively Granger causes the immigration inflow. Ekrame Boubtane, Dramane Coulibaly & Christophe Rault
Export Sophistication Measures
One of the many aspects of China’s trade integration that have puzzled the economists is the rapid upgrading of China’s exports: since the mid-Nineties the range of China’s export products, impressively expanded. In particular, Chinese producers have been able to export capital- and skill-intensive products, high-technology products, and products that are usually considered as belonging to the area of specialization of more developed countries. How does this export upgrading contribute to the Chinese growth?
In order to quantify the export sophistication of Chinese regions and to identify their capacity to grasp growth benefits through the reshaping of the structure of production beyond the boundaries established by factor endowments, CEPII’s researchers have computed yearly indicators of Chinese localities’ export sophistication and linked them to economic growth.1 They use the Hausmann, Hwang and Rodrik (2007)2’s measure of the sophistication of a country’s export basket, resulting from the comparison to the income level of countries with similar export structures. In this indicator, each good k that a country can potentially produce and export has an intrinsic level of sophistication, (PRODYk). This level is the weighted average of the income levels of good k ’s exporters. The weights correspond to the revealed comparative advantage of each country j in good k. The sophistication level of country j’s exports, denoted by EXPYj, is then computed as the average level of sophistication of its export basket. Measures of product-level sophistication PRODY for 1997 were developed using the BACI world trade dataset,3 and EXPY indexes were constructed for the export baskets of Chinese localities (provinces and prefectures) based on Chinese customs data, which report region-level exports and imports by 6-digit product over the 1997-2007 period. One feature of interest in this dataset is that it allows us to differentiate between domestic and foreign trading firms, and between processing trade and ordinary trade. The following scatterplot of EXPY against per-capita GDP indicates, in line with previous findings by Rodrik (2006)4 that rich (poor) countries export products that tend to be exported by other rich (poor) countries. China is an ‘outlier’ in this relationship, in terms of both the product bundles exported by domestic and foreign firms. In 1997, the export bundle of domestic firms was as sophisticated (10800$) as that of Belarus, a country 2.5 times richer than China in PPP per capita terms; that of foreign firms was higher, at 12500$, similar to that of Portugal, a country eight times richer than China in PPP per capita terms in 1997. The per capita income level associated with exports by domestic entities increased by 15.5% between 1997 and 2007 to reach a figure of 12,500$, similar to that in Lithuania, a country which is three times richer than China in PPP per capita terms. This figure remains however lower than that of foreign entities, which rose by 25.7% over the period to reach 15,776$, a figure similar to that in the UK, a country seven times richer than China in PPP per capita terms.
Figure 1: The relationship between per-capita PPP GDP and EXPY
(in logs)
1997
2007
Source: Authors’ computations based on BACI and WDI data.
Considering the evolution of China’s sophistication over time, distinguishing between domestic and foreign firms, the recent upgrading of China’s exports is not confined to foreign entities (which typically operate in processing trade), but also concerns domestic producers. The export sophistication of both types of exporters has risen rapidly. The income level associated with exports by domestic entities increased by 15.5% between 1997 and 2007. Over the same period that of foreign entities however rose even faster, by 25.7%, so that the gap between domestic and foreign export sophistication doubled from 1720$ to 3266$. A similar message comes from the consideration of the share of high-tech products in exports as a measure of export sophistication. Figure 2 shows the relationship between real income per capita (in constant 2000 dollars) and export sophistication across provinces in 2007. The correlation between these two variables in our sample of 30 provinces is positive, with a figure of 0.70. Figure 2: Export sophistication and real GDP per capita, 2007
![]() Source: Authors’ computations based on Chinese customs and China Statistical Yearbooks data. Empirical results based on econometric evaluations of growth regressions relating variation in export sophistication and growth across China show that the gains in growth only occur when the improved technology is developed by domestic-owned firms and embedded in ordinary trade. This suggests that the different sources (export regime and firm type) of Chinese upgrading export must be identified for the true measurement of the improvement in technology and its implications for economic growth. Notes: (1) Jarreau, J. & Poncet S., (2009), Export Sophistication and Economic Performance: Evidence from Chinese Provinces, CEPII Working Paper, N° 2009-34, December 2009. (2) Hausmann, R., Hwang J. & Rodrik, D., (2007), What You Export Matters, Journal of Economic Growth, N° 12, pages 1-25. (3) BACI is downloadable from http://www.cepii.fr/anglaisgraph/bdd/baci.htm and Export Sophistication Dataset is downloadable from http://www.cepii.fr/anglaisgraph/bdd/sophistication.htm. (4) Rodrik, D., (2006),What’s so Special About China’s Exports?, China & World Economy, N°14(5), pages 1-19.
Does Importing more Inputs Raise Exports? Firm Level Evidence from France Maria Bas & Vanessa Strauss-Kahn Joint Estimates of Automatic and Discretionary Fiscal Policy: the OECD 1981-2003 Julia Darby & Jacques Melitz Migration: Burden or Benefit from Welfare State Financing Xavier Chojnicki & Lionel Ragot The Performance of Socially Responsible Funds: Does the Screening Process Matter? Gunther Capelle-Blancard & Stéphanie Monjon Market Size, Competition, and the Product Mix of Exporters Thierry Mayer, Marc Melitz & Gianmarco Ottaviano The Trade Unit Values Database Antoine Berthou & Charlotte Emlinger Carbon Price Drivers: Phase I Versus Phase II Equilibrium? Anna Creti, Pierre-André Jouvet & Valérie Mignon Rebalancing Growth in China: An International Perspective Agnès Bénassy-Quéré, Benjamin Carton & Ludovic Gauvin Economic Integration in the EuroMed: Current Status and Review of Studies Joachim Jarreau The Decision to Import Capital Goods in India: Firms' Financial Factors Matter FDI from the South: the Role of Institutional Distance and Natural Resources Mariya Aleksynska & Olena Havrylchyk What International Monetary System for a Fast-Changing World Economy? Agnès Bénassy-Quéré & Jean Pisani-Ferry CEPII Working Papers are available free, on-line, in PDF format.
LA LETTRE DU CEPII,
MONTHLY
Agnès Bénassy-Quéré, Jean Pisani-Ferry & Yu Yongding
Organized by Le Club du CEPII. Paris, June 28, 2011 |
||||||||
| The contents of this issue were finalised June 14, 2011 | ||||||||
|
||||||||